Zara, a monthly blog correspondent and Drummers alumni, writes this week’s post, sharing research she has conducted regarding the migrational, brooding, and nesting patterns of birds. She formed a hypothesis, and describes her subsequent research, along with collaborating expert opinions here.
Global warming and climate change are terms that we commonly hear in the media and on the news. It is apparent that climate change is affecting the earth on a macro-level. But I was curious to see what effect, if any, global warming is having on a smaller, more specific level. So, I researched the effect of climate change on bird phenology, which is just a fancy word for the study of natural patterns such as migration, brooding and nesting. Before my research, I hypothesized that the effect of climate change on birds would be fairly insignificant. I discovered, however, that I was sadly mistaken. Experts on the topic believe it’s probable that, unless there are major changes, thousands of bird species will be in grave danger by the end of this century.
Let me first share some overall statistics I learned about climate change. I was shocked to learn that there has been a 1.08 ± 0.36 degree Fahrenheit increase in temperature throughout the 20th century (“Climate Change 2001,” pg. 3). And the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates that the earth’s average temperature will rise by 2.0-11.5 degrees Fahrenheit over the next century (“Basics”).
But how exactly has the earth’s increasing temperature affected bird phenology? The most drastic effect has been in their migration. The bulk of my research on bird migration came from studies done at Powdermill Nature Reserve (PNR), a bird banding station in southwestern PA that has been banding thousands of birds per year since 1961. Due to the sheer number of birds coming through the banding lab, ornithologists at PNR have compiled interesting data on migration patterns throughout the years. Using that data, I learned that the beginning of the spring migration has been moved forward by four days over 45 years. This trend towards earlier spring migration is accompanied by increasingly warmer winters in PNR’s area. (Van Buskirk, Mulvihill, Leberman, p. 763)
Birds are divided into two different classes of migrants: short distance and long distance migrants. Short distance migrants are the birds that arrive at Powdermill earlier in the spring and they are responding better to climate change than long distance migrants . This is likely due to the fact that they can adjust when they begin their migration in the spring based on temperatures. The weather where the short distance migrants start their migration and where they end it are likely to have similar patterns since they are relatively close to each other. Because of this, the birds have a fairly good idea of when the weather at their destination will be suitable for nesting and brooding and they are able to begin their migration whenever that may occur (Van Buskirk, Mulvihill, Leberman, p. 761).
Long distance migrants, on the other hand, are likely prompted to migrate by day length as opposed to weather. Because of this, they may migrate at their normal date, but because of climate change, the temperature and weather in their destination may be suboptimal (Van Buskirk, Mulvihill, Leberman, p. 761). They may be a few days behind the best climate conditions for nesting and brooding. In fact the study done at PNR showed that long distance migrants showed up during spring migration much later than short distance migrants (Van Buskirk, Mulvihill, Leberman, p. 764).
According to Lucas DeGroote, the current bird banding coordinator at PNR, the best time for birds to arrive at their breeding grounds in spring is when the tree leaves are young and most desirable to insects. If long distance migrants arrive too late, they could miss the window of high food availability (DeGroote).
Long distance migrants, therefore, are facing a dire situation. While climate change is continually affecting the conditions at their destinations, they are not able to adapt the timing of their migrations accordingly. As time goes on, the birds will arrive further and further past optimal conditions, thus putting the species at risk of extinction. This is especially true for species with specialized needs or habitats.
The information I learned throughout my research is truly alarming. It is appalling to realize that 15-37% of the world’s bird species will be facing extinction by 2050 (“State of the World’s Birds 2004,” pg. 49). My research has made me even more determined to spread the word and alert others of these facts. Birds aren’t the only animals in danger if climate change trends continue unchanged. It is up to us to save them!
“Basics.” EPA. Environmental Protection Agency, n.d. Web. 4 Feb. 2015. <http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/basics/>.
BirdLife International (2004) State of the world’s birds 2004: indicators for our changing world. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International.
DeGroote, Lucas. Personal Interview. 18 February 2015.
IPCC, 2001: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Houghton, J.T., Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P.J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, and C.A. Johnson (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 881pp.
Van Buskirk, Josh, Robert S. Mulvihill, and Robert C. Leberman. “Variable Shifts in Spring and Autumn Migration Phenology in North American Songbirds Associated with Climate Change.” Global Change Biology 15.3 (2009): 760-71.